🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive policy to prohibit social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples internationally. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and guardians are observing intently to see if this approach will become a template for countries abroad.

Across Europe Movement

Across Europe, a growing chorus of states are moving toward parallel measures.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the leader declaring that smartphones and apps are "robbing our youngsters' youth". Legislation is expected to be formalized soon.
• The Norwegian government is planning to introduce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to protect children from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to verify the user details of social media account holders. Authorities have suggested that an similar ban could be "a potential tools on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on lawmakers to approve a bill raising the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a comparable action, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged parents to restrict their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has passed a advisory resolution supporting a ban for under-16s unless parental consent is given. Even though it cautions of the "habit-forming" quality of these platforms, the step does not enact enforceable legislation.

"An effective age barrier is a useful first step," stated a leading European lawmaker supporting the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Stance

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but stressing any decision must be "based on conclusive data".

Previously, momentum grew behind a proposal to enact limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the government pledged to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. An organization established by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after encountering harmful platform posts suggests that a blanket age ban may not improve online safety and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the refusal of the social media companies to build platforms and apps that are secure and suitable for minors," said a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A State-by-State Approach

In the United States, action is largely unfolding at the regional level due to national gridlock.

• Utah requires guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a law banning children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has approved a regulation limiting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with extra time requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise passed bills demanding parental consent for under-16s to create social media profiles.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from certain figures to follow the Australian lead, a nationwide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Perspectives

Beyond Europe and the US, further countries are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for under-16s effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, world bodies strike a more nuanced position. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "could have unintended consequences". The organization highlights that social networks can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable children and that bans should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to prioritize user protection.

Even as this global discussion continues, the policies of this nation and several other countries demonstrate that policymakers globally are increasingly willing to wait for the industry to make changes on their own.