🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.