🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an adorable little “ham sandwich”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a large but guardian-like companion. Zephyr has “constant motion” and wiggles like a worm. Lillooet the beluga is the “biggest cuddle bug” with a gentle spirit.

A group of thirty enclosed beluga whales in a Canadian entertainment facility have been entangled in a struggle between a shuttered park, public officials and welfare campaigners.

But those working directly with the whales say the intense debate over their fate often ignores the complexities of the whales who, after growing up in captivity, have been closely studied by the caretakers who interact with them daily.

After the national authorities blocked the transfer of the belugas to a foreign facility, the struggling facility near Niagara Falls where they are housed warned to put them down unless the federal government covers the expense of keeping them alive. Canada’s fisheries minister has refused that request, placing the thirty whales in an ever more uncertain circumstance.

Intelligent Marine Mammals

Experts say that beluga whales’ neural makeup, along with their vocal imitation skills, cognitive challenges and group interactions point to they are highly cognitive mammals – something a former trainer discovered personally.

She spent a significant period as a whale caretaker, a role that required earning the trust of the aquatic animals.

“Establishing those relationships over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of affection. At the start, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “In time, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so magical and fulfilling.”

The trainer knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was even so astounded by the details and quirks in their characters. She cultivated a particular love for a pair of whales with different personalities.

“One whale accepted me. Cleo made me earn it,” she said. “Each changed the way I perceive connection.”

Growing Opposition and Facility Decline

Her interaction with the whales evolved against a backdrop of growing public opposition to their captivity.

During her tenure at the park, multiple belugas and the park’s one orca, the orca, died. In total, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a statistic which the facility links to expected lifespan, but which advocates say indicates the poor conditions in which they were kept.

The facility did not admit visitors to the visitors over the summer, but the former trainer says she observed directly consequences of the cessation. “Structural materials is breaking off from the enclosures because they’re in disrepair and not being maintained. The whales are curious and so they grab fragments and move about with chunks in their mouth. It’s upsetting to see.”

The park did not reply to a inquiry, but previously stated: “The whales … receive far higher quality health care and constant attention than any person in the Britain, or anywhere else.”

Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions

Burgess was dismissed from the park in recent months following the passing of a beluga, an unwell beluga the park staff had to euthanize. She said the park believed information of the incident were leaked to the press and she was released not long after.

The uncertainty over the whales’ future has left Burgess and current and former trainers in distress. She says the park’s threat to end the lives of its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “logistically impossible” endeavor, adding any attempts to euthanize even a one beluga would require “considerable personnel”, trucks and specialized tools.

“It’s impossible in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess backs calls for the whales to be removed promptly from the facility, with its crumbling tanks and dwindling staff.

In late September, the nation’s government official denied a bid to transfer the whales to an overseas location.

“To approve the proposal would have meant a perpetual existence in captivity and a reversion to display for amusement,” the minister wrote. “As society, we know that marine mammals are meant for the wild, not in pools for our enjoyment. I could not in ethical standing authorize an export that would prolong the conditions these belugas have endured.”

But the former trainer said the official’s comments reflect a more general incorrect perception of the realities of existence for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.

“The society needs to realize these are whales that have lived entirely in enclosed habitats and they will need constant supervision for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “Many just don’t understand that it’s not as easy as saying ‘shut it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Ongoing Debate

As decision makers struggle to find a answer, suggestions have emerged, some of which have questionable practicality. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be let go into the open waters of northern regions – where whales are a key source of nourishment for local populations.

A suggested sanctuary in the province of eastern Canada, which now received official endorsement, has shown to be most controversial. The planned location, which includes a large area of protected cove, remains undeveloped. Advocates remain hopeful that it could in time represent a long term solution for a number of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among caretakers she’s spoken with, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “only an experiment” in the whales’ fate.

Others say the idea of a refuge indicates a changing attitudes away from captive facilities and could represent a viable solution in the near future.

An official, head of the sanctuary project, said the location will replicate the mental engagement and feeding regimen the whales obtain from caretakers, albeit in a much larger area. He said after the medical condition of whales is fully assessed, which could take months|an extended period|